Newsagent wars

First of all, click on this (it may be Microsoft but it is more powerful than google maps, it pains me to write).

Very near to me there is a newsagent . I like this, in fact it is one of the reasons why I chose to live here. 20 seconds away is also a deli, off-licence, and video rental. Now there is also two hardware stores (serious DIY stores), a greasy spoon cafe and two bathroom stores within the same walking distance, but I don’t use those :)

I also have a couple of Indians, two chinese, a fish n chips, pizza/burger/kebab and various other misc stores (including Relate, a costume shop, two motorbike shops, a postcard shop(?), a alternative health shop… you get the picture!). The only things I lack is a decent restaurant and all day cafe.

Now, back to the point Chris, I mentioned a Newsagent, a medium sized one, fairly well stocked and open to 7 or 8pm (1 on the map). Further down the road is another one, run by a quiet Indian family, it’s small and in need to a good refurbishment (but you sense they have never done the level of business to do such things) (2 on the map). Open until 8 or 9pm. Opposite them is a post office selling similar sort of things, open during the day only.

And that was the way of the world. The key here is that though it is a busy road (it’s the A23), the traffic doesn’t really stop and the catchment area isn’t great. You basically want houses all around, 360 degress. There are basically no houses one side of the road (a couple of small streets) and while on the other side there is a large area of housing, the layout of roads means they will always pass a Newsagents before reaching the Preston road.

About a year a go a shop opened called Africmart. This was an odd shop, run by a guy who looks like a huge but friendly bouncer . The store sells some vegetables and fairly common food and also much which is obviously more common to those who are from Africa. He never seems busy but the shop seems like a good thing.

Then recently a new store opened just a few steps away from this shop and the small newsagent. It sells various international foods and also some bog standard stuff such as milk (and also some basic newsagent essentials).

It’s getting cosy, the small trade the newsagent would do is now being shared by these two new shops especially on the food side.

Now, another shop has just opened ‘top news’ a weird thing, a large sparse shop which seems to sell itself on traditional newsagent creditials (we sell newspapers, snacks, magazines, grociers etc) but looks to have a strong chinese slant. What were they thinking?! “hmm let’s open a newsagent” “where shall we put it in Brighton?” “why don’t we place it next to the three other places selling the same thing!”. They are advertising 24/7 opening (impressive and useful) but they are going to struggle to do business with so many selling basically the same thing next door.

Finally, this week, another new store has opened, this is again a food convience store, but also a strong slant on drink as well (a year a go I was worried by sole local off licence would shut when unwins went bust, now I have endless shops selling liquids to destroy my liver). The street with limited footfall, no parking and meters away from a main shopping street now has many shops all with a slightly different slant but basically overlaping.

As you may guess from my tone I feel a little sorry for the small old newsagent that is stuck in the middle. They never did a huge trade to start with, worked long hours, and this must be hurting. Every time I walk in either a young quiet chap or an oldish man is a cartakers coat with a very slight build stand behind a old tiny desk with a little till on it and I also feel rather bad for only buying some milk. I wish them good luck!

Welcome back

In August I signed up with Dreamhost.

Until now I have used Freedom2surf’s web hosting service. I originally signed up with them as they seemed a good company (and still do, though now owned by pipex) and were cheap, £25 a year. When I first started using them they transferred my domain to them (it was all a bit new to me so I just presumed this was a required step) and their domain name costs were not cheap (£10). A few years later I wanted email as well (another £25), and the cost started going up. The service was stable, but I was started to need more. They offered just one database, not much when you are playing around with different software, such as Joomla, running WordPress and trying to experiment with your own silly web apps which require a DB, plus the quote for the database was tiny (10mb). Plus their web stats were crappy, and the log files were fiddly (kept for a few days on a secure website, no ftp and wget didn’t seem able to get them which made automating difficult, plus each file would download with the same filename by default).

During the summer I ended up at the GoDaddy website. I had heard bad things about them, but they did seem to offer an awful lot for a very cheap price. But I wouldn’t get that warm cosy feeling having my website hosted by them, so I waited. Dreamhost were recommended but not the cheapest. However after seeing just how much you do get (shell account, cron, etc), and that it would still be cheaper that my current setup, I went for it.

So far impressed, a lot of nice things and a lot of stuff (databases, email addresses, easy to get logs, easy to upgrade WordPress, etc). There does seem to be an awful lot of login requests when using their backend, each service and area seems to have it’s own username and password system, but this isn’t a huge problem. Plus I seemed to join them at a bad time, and there has been some downtime of late.

nostuff.org has been down for the last couple of weeks, and this is just down to me. I tried to transfer the actually domain across, though the move was rejected (I may not have set the new DNS servers up right before putting in the transfer request). I then basically did nothing for a few weeks. I finally got around to it yesterday, the transfer this time went fine and now everything seems good again.

So, hopefully this is still on some of your RSS feeds and you haven’t all deserted me! Welcome back.

Talis Platform

A few days a go I was bored. I had read loads about the ‘Talis Platform’ a open standards ‘you can talk to it with an API’ type thing that holds data, and shares it with you (or more to the point, shares it with your application).

Could a non-programmer like me make use of this? Hello No! but I did wonder if a non-programmer like me could cut ‘n’ paste their examples and play for myself.

Read my experience of it (though it is a little like watching the slow boy in the corner trying to read Roger Red Hat)

As an aside, I wrote this article using WordPress, but as ‘pages’ not blog entries – WordPress has basic Content Management features like creating standard pages. (Richard: that’s why it didn’t show up on RSS!).

laptop

In 2002 I bought a rather shiny sony laptop. FX705 I think, can’t remember. Sony had a wide range of laptops at the time. this was the budget range. It was/is heavy, looks less sexy than the average sony laptop, but had a good spec for the price.

As a geeky tech type person I have rather surprisingly never re-installed it. I think I was resisting partly for sub-conscious reasons: at University we spent our entire time installing, re-configuring and generally tweaking (i.e. breaking, breaking and more breaking) our computers, I wanted to prove to myself that I had moved on, grown up. Now it was a tool, for listening, communicating, reading (there are some pages on wikipedia I still haven’t read) etc. Spending hours at a computer simply to break its registry and reinstall the OS again was unproductive. And I am a productive person. I know, I keep telling myself so it must be true. well okay, actually, I just read BBC news and slashdot. But the thought was there.

Anyways. After over 5 years of use it had gradually crawled to just-about-quicker-than-stationary. I think people should do research in to this, it fascinates me, how can a system, which didn’t have that many applications installed, had minimal stuff running at start up, etc, end up at the point that running anything took 30 seconds or so. Start IE, or Firefox, or Word, or even the sodding volume control (there is nothing more annoying in Windows that the bloody time it takes to allow you to change the bloody volume) and then sit back and relax (or sit back and get stressed, I normally went for the latter).

How can a system just become like this? I had pruned and cleaned and done all the things one can think of (and the thing you are thinking of, yup tried that and all). We all take it for granted but why. I was trying to explain to someone why I was doing this, and failed to give a good explanation. I tried to explain things about registry bloat and lost of dll files – but can’t you clean them out, and do they really make it that much slower – well ummm sort of. I didn’t do a very good job of explaining which made me realise that I really had no idea why installing the same OS from scratch should make such a difference.

Sometimes I feel that all computers should just be shipped with a Knoppix CD-ROM, and the Harddisk just used for storing docs and user files. An OS is much more secure and will be consistent over time in its responsiveness if it is on a read only CD-ROM :)

So I now have a new installed computer, made possible partly due to the external USB drive I was given recently (though my laptop’s two USB ports are v1 and so it is very slow).

Software installed (for my own reference, and in case you see anything of interest):

  • Opera – the alternative, alternative web browser (why spend time using loads of Firefox plugins when Opera has it all built in).
  • Thunderbird – never seems to get the fame it deserves (and it is disappointing that it is being split apart from the Mozilla organisation, they had loads of cash (thanks to Google ads) and Thunderbird could do with some of it. There’s no real alternatives on Windows, except Eudora and OE.
  • Firefox
  • Killcopy – Get annoyed when copying loads of files and it fails halfway through because it doesn’t like a file, but you have no easy way of knowing what directories/files have been copied and which have not? killcopy sits as a option in the right click menu and makes copyinig and moving files far less painful
  • Picassa – Google’s picture viewer
  • Thumbnails Plus – another image viewer with a few more options, purchased a licence a few years a go.
  • XNview – yet another image viewer, but some good batch processing options
  • Notepad++ For years Windows was lacking a good free text editor, there was PFE, which was ok – not wonderful – and no longer updated. For a while I used Text Editor, but Notepad++ seems to work very well with no configuration required.
  • Itunes – for the Ipod!
  • BBC Iplayer – just signed up for this.
  • Quicktime, flash, realplayer, Java.
  • Foxit PDF viewer – much quicker than Adobe Acrobat reader, and doesn’t try to run at startup.
  • May yet install: 7zip, ‘command prompt from here’ powertoy, ActiveState Perl, Google Desktop (just for replacing Windows crappy search facility), Office, MeetingMaker, Putty, Filezilla, Skype

Quicktime, Realplayer, Adobe Acrobat Reader all hit two of my pet hates. These are applications which for most people are just there to help them access content on the web, yet they all try to run when Windows starts – Why do I need a PDF viewer running when it can just run when I require it. Secondly they all put icons on the desktop, and often in ‘Quick Lauch’, most people will never need to run these manually so putting an icon on the desktop is just silly. It promotes their product at the expensive of annoying the user (or for the average user, they will not know if it is ‘safe’ to delete the icon even though they know they do not use it, which in my book is reducing the user experience). Itunes, Picassa and others are also guilty but at least these are applications the user may want to run and have a slight reason why they want to run at startup.

The great rock ‘n’ broadband rip off.

This was kicked off when I was asked to recommend a broadband service for someone. Their use would be low and they needed cheap. Wasn’t that interested in download caps or speed (so I don’t really mention it below), and I presume they will be with the service for at least 12 months (so if a provider offers free connection/signup if you stay with them that long I consider it free). Fine, I thought they might be able to get a deal for £11.

The first two adsl providers I tried were freedom2surf (a well regarded isp bought by pipex a few years a go) and uk online (the consumer operation of easynet, generally well regarded, and now – the only downside – owned by Murdoch).

  • Freedom2surf – £13.99 – need to buy equipment, no signup fee, but still a little pricey.
  • UK Online – £9.99 a month -need to buy equipment and £25 fee, but still good value. However, turns out that it only applies for those exchanges they have their own equipment in, the price was actually ~£19.99. So no good.
  • Tesco was meant to be cheap – Strangely their servers return a ‘403 fobidden’ error message when I tried to access the page linked to here from my office PC (and others on campus). The same thing happened a year a go when I tried, I emailed them at the time but just got a dumb reply. Why would they disallow access to that page from the University of Sussex campus? The only thing I can think of it perhaps because we are the University of SuSEX?!). Anyway, their cheapest deal is £13.97, free signup and connection, so could be an option.
  • Bulldog (also owned by Pipex) – They had a bad reputation a few years a go, but thought it was worth the risk especially when it was £9.99 a month and a free modem. However, again, turns out this requires their own equipment in the exchange, once it was clear that this was not the case for the exchange in question we were redirected to the pipex homepage…
  • Pipex – First glance this again looks good, £9.99 and no obvious ‘6 months only’, each option allows you to add a telephone package on top for a set price. However what isn’t clear at all is that you can only get that price if you take the telephone package as well. It is then clear that it is £14.99, not impressed.
  • I normally ignore the big providers, they are generally high priced, and how poor customer service. BT in particular seems to play on its name and the fact that people presume that as they have a BT line a BT broadband account would be best (of course the reason most people have a BT line is that they dragged their heals for years on local-loop unbundling – allowing others to provide phone services to customers – and then forcing everyone to subscribe to a free calls package and not allowing you to just subscribe for line rental, what was OFCOM doing!?). Anyway, perhaps I was being unfair and should give them a look.
  • BT – The homepage currently shows that broadband £8.95 a month, currently no asterisk or footnote, no small print, that’s all it says. However it quickly turns out that their cheapest deal is £17.99 a month (the price above is just for a few months). It is so frustrating that so many people sign up with BT because they get their phone rental (and compulsory monopoly-like competition-destroying calls package) with them. No thanks.
  • Tiscai – never heard good things about them, cheapest price is £14.99.
  • Freesever Wanadoo Orange – again £14.99
  • Finally I remembers a friend used to use Plusnet – they seemed to offer a package for £9.99 – as of yet i can’t see any reasons why this is not true (haven’t found any mention of requirements of their equipment in the exchange etc). They also seem like an alright company.

So, in conclusion I think I shall reccommend Plusnet. Failing that, Tesco or Freedom2surf. Oh and BT are still crap, which makes me happy that I have not paid them a penny in the last few years (no phone line and I use NTL Virgin Media for broadband). Oh and the name of this post… Just about every ISP advertised a price that was not available to us for various reasons and many had hidden extras, rip off.

Brighton New council priorities

See this Argus article: New council leader spells out his party’s priorities, from the article:

  • Review Labour’s plans for a rapid transport bus system while re-examining the monorail project
  • Revisit the controversial school lottery scheme which has divided the city
  • Push for underground car parks in new developments to ensure extra homes do not add pressure to the already overstretched road network, and
  • Concentrate on delivering less congestion by removing build-outs while putting plans for a park and ride on the back burner.

OK. Council Tax, sounds good but what will need to be cut (unless we can find savings, or the increase in the number of homes brings about a big enough increase to sustain things).

Monorail, very little on the web, seems to be between Palace pier and Marina, the same route as the Volks railway, sounds fine, but hardly the saviour of city wide transport problems.

School lottery. No real view, I respect the council for making a tough decision and not being shy of a radical and new approach (which they must have known would get a bad press), it stops those with money buying a place at a good school then it is a step towards equality for all, though have no real problem with a new council wanting to review such a controversial decision.

‘Removing build-outs’? I’m presuming this means no more extensions to buildings, I’m not sure. And if so, not sure this is the answer to problems. He does say they are not anti-development nor anti-progress, which is good, but the proof is in the pudding. And it has been shown with the last council that strong planning controls and vision (albeit through specialist urban planning contractors) can lead to great regeneration of areas (such as the New England Quarter, Jubilee library area), I hope this continues, rather than just allowing the higher bidder to do what they want, as if often the case in so many towns.

My thoughts: We have a successful city with a great reputation (cultural, vibrant, alternative, anything-goes, party, arty, rich&poor) which we need to keep and build on, we need to redevelop key sites such as the marina, Brighton centre and King Alfred being ambitious, daring and original, and thinking about how these developments provide space and interconnect with adjacent areas. And we need to attract companies to set up base in the town, with some bias I suggest blue chip, web/tech companies are ideally suited to the city and attract those with a high disposal-able income, same is true for law and financial firms. Finally, if there is one negative aspect of Brighton, it can look dirty at times, and work needs to continue to clean it up.

Analog web statistics

I use the wonderful Analog for web stats. Unfortunately it hasn’t been updated for a while (2004 in fact).

However I noticed that some kind soles on the mailing list have updated analog so that it includes Vista in the OS report.

I’ve put a copy here, just download the zip (Windows), extract and replace the original analog.exe.
See this mailing list message (and the thread that follows) for more information and credit to those who produced this new version.

Analog exe (as a zip) support for vista