<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Osx on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene</title>
    <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/tags/osx/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Osx on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nostuff.org/archive/tags/osx/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Things that annoy me with itunes and iphone ipod app</title>
      <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/2011/things-that-annoy-me-with-itunes-and-ipod-iphone-music/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nostuff.org/archive/2011/things-that-annoy-me-with-itunes-and-ipod-iphone-music/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Number 1. Metadata is crap. Not just bad. Not just ‘Jonny needs to try harder’ in parts. out and out crap. Even on popular albums. This is the most popular digital music system there is. by far. and they can’t get it right.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When I want to browse albums I want to see albums, not random one-off tracks that so happen to include the album they belonged to (which is often the case from iTunes). Itunes is &lt;em&gt;designed&lt;/em&gt; to allow you to buy one track, not whole albums, so why is iTunes designed in such a way that it doesn’t cater for this. Album browse is useless because most of it is random one of tracks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Twitter clients</title>
      <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/2009/twitter-clients/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nostuff.org/archive/2009/twitter-clients/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From about an hour after signing up to Twitter until very recently I used &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.twhirl.org/&#34;&gt;Twirl&lt;/a&gt; on both PC and Mac as my Twitter client. I was happy with it, and still am, but had noticed people using other clients and wanted to see if I was missing anything.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I round up my findings here:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;figure style=&#34;width: 480px&#34; class=&#34;wp-caption alignnone&#34;&gt;[&lt;img loading=&#34;lazy&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; title=&#34;Three twitter clients&#34; src=&#34;https://nostuff.org/archive/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Picture-111.png&#34; alt=&#34;Picture 1.png&#34; width=&#34;480&#34; height=&#34;332&#34; /&gt;][2]&lt;figcaption class=&#34;wp-caption-text&#34;&gt;Three twitter clients&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Automator</title>
      <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/2009/apple-automator/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nostuff.org/archive/2009/apple-automator/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Automator on OS X is one of those things I use about once a year, but it always impresses.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Many attempts to use drap and drop to replace programming lead to confusing design. Examples are yahoo pipes, Business Objects, and most of all MS Access.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What’s impressive with Automator is that it always seems it was designed with the very problem you want to solve in mind.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Problem&lt;/strong&gt; (apart from the drink)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
