2008 : nostuff.org under review

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:26:28 +0000

It takes someone with a grossly over inflated ego, and thinks their website is a trillion times more important than it actually is to try and write a review of the previous year. What sort of idiot does that, as if anyone will read it!

Hello.

Think of it as a school report, annual appraisal, or cheap channel 4 air time filler around the new year.

nostuff.org has grown in the last year, so did the readership. Some of the posts were even read by humans.

Navel gazing

Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:30:12 +0000

I was having a quick think about the categories I use here. I have tried to use categories which match people’s interests. e.g. someone from Brighton can choose to read (and subscribe to) ‘Brighton’, same for technology or libraries.

I’ve recently started to blog a bit more about things related to my work. Which is best summed up as where technology (& web) and libraries (& information management) meet. This includes searching, metadata, cataloguing, making data and information accessible, and scholarly publishing (and changing it to be less stupid). My rule of thumb is that if I feel something would only be of interest to those in the library (or HE) tech area, I stick it in ‘libraries and technology’, if it could be of interest to those who are generally interested in techy stuff then it is added to the technology category.

Nostuff.org on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene

2008 : nostuff.org under review

Navel gazing