<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Newswatch on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene</title>
    <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/tags/newswatch/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Newswatch on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nostuff.org/archive/tags/newswatch/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>BBC Newswatch</title>
      <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/2007/bbc-newswatch/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nostuff.org/archive/2007/bbc-newswatch/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/default.stm&#34;&gt;BBC Newswatch&lt;/a&gt; was set up after the Hutton &lt;strike&gt;whitewash&lt;/strike&gt; inquiry as a place to monitor and feedback on BBC News. It seems that recently it has had a bit of a slimming down, with many parts of the site being reduced to ‘&lt;a href=&#34;http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/profiles/default.stm&#34;&gt;nothing to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/notes_and_corrections/default.stm&#34;&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;‘ messages. However, by following just one link from the main homepage: ‘styleguide’ and you will notice the left hand menu still has a link to the &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/notes_and_corrections/notes_a_-_z/default.stm&#34;&gt;archived ‘notes’ pages&lt;/a&gt;. Most BBC ‘downsized’ sites are &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/default.stm&#34; title=&#34;check the notice at the top&#34;&gt;simply&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/&#34;&gt;frozen&lt;/a&gt;, I wonder why they didn’t do the same here. One rational explanation might be that it was generating a large amount of email from those who objected to the BBCs stance on various matters and terminology.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
