<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene</title>
    <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/tags/2008/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 2008 on nostuff.org archive | Chris Keene</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nostuff.org/archive/tags/2008/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>2008 : nostuff.org under review</title>
      <link>https://nostuff.org/archive/2009/2008-nostufforg-under-review/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nostuff.org/archive/2009/2008-nostufforg-under-review/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It takes someone with a grossly over inflated ego, and thinks their website is a trillion times more important than it actually is to try and write a review of the previous year. What sort of idiot does that, as if anyone will read it!&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Hello.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Think of it as a school report, annual appraisal, or cheap channel 4 air time filler around the new year.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;nostuff.org has grown in the last year, so did the readership. Some of the posts were even read by humans.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
